<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shazam iPhone App Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailyappshow.com/shazam-iphone-app-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailyappshow.com/shazam-iphone-app-review</link>
	<description>The leading iPhone and iPod Touch App review website.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:29:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Harris</title>
		<link>http://dailyappshow.com/shazam-iphone-app-review/comment-page-1#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyappshow.com/?p=24#comment-795</guid>
		<description>I find it works on a pretty wide variety of music, but is bad with indie labels and foreign recordings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it works on a pretty wide variety of music, but is bad with indie labels and foreign recordings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerad Hill</title>
		<link>http://dailyappshow.com/shazam-iphone-app-review/comment-page-1#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerad Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyappshow.com/?p=24#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Really? I have all types of music, Jazz and classical included and it works fine. I will add that voice recognition plays a part in quickly identifying a song but not necessary. Of course the music has to be searchable in order for it to work with the app. It&#039;s not meant to be able to tell you the name of a song being played in a small bar outside of your city limits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? I have all types of music, Jazz and classical included and it works fine. I will add that voice recognition plays a part in quickly identifying a song but not necessary. Of course the music has to be searchable in order for it to work with the app. It&#8217;s not meant to be able to tell you the name of a song being played in a small bar outside of your city limits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://dailyappshow.com/shazam-iphone-app-review/comment-page-1#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 01:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyappshow.com/?p=24#comment-228</guid>
		<description>It is cool, but only works with pop music, it is weak for jazz, folk, and piss-poor for classical (I am guessing not a big part of Jerad&#039;s collection).  It has had time in noisy places unless you get right by a speaker.  The technology underlying this is cool, but not that hard to understand.  My best guess is that it creates a hash value based on the waveform for the sampling period which is compared to a database.  Not that different from how geneticists search a large body  of biological sequence with a small section.  It, therefore,  requires the each recording be cataloged and hashed.  So multiple versions of the same some by the same artist need to hashed individually.  This would also explain why less popular music is less available.  SInce this work is driven as marketing tool, the cost-benefit ratio is too small to work on large catalogs of older, less popular music.  It is not as I have seen in some postings that, for example classical music, is too complicated, it is an economic or licensing decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is cool, but only works with pop music, it is weak for jazz, folk, and piss-poor for classical (I am guessing not a big part of Jerad&#8217;s collection).  It has had time in noisy places unless you get right by a speaker.  The technology underlying this is cool, but not that hard to understand.  My best guess is that it creates a hash value based on the waveform for the sampling period which is compared to a database.  Not that different from how geneticists search a large body  of biological sequence with a small section.  It, therefore,  requires the each recording be cataloged and hashed.  So multiple versions of the same some by the same artist need to hashed individually.  This would also explain why less popular music is less available.  SInce this work is driven as marketing tool, the cost-benefit ratio is too small to work on large catalogs of older, less popular music.  It is not as I have seen in some postings that, for example classical music, is too complicated, it is an economic or licensing decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerad Hill</title>
		<link>http://dailyappshow.com/shazam-iphone-app-review/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerad Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyappshow.com/?p=24#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Check out Robert&#039;s while driving review of Shazam, ha!

http://www.viddler.com/explore/sandieman/videos/435/

Thanks for the Viddler friend add Robert!

http://www.viddler.com/jeradhill/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out Robert&#8217;s while driving review of Shazam, ha!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.viddler.com/explore/sandieman/videos/435/">http://www.viddler.com/explore/sandieman/videos/435/</a></p>
<p>Thanks for the Viddler friend add Robert!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.viddler.com/jeradhill/">http://www.viddler.com/jeradhill/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBush</title>
		<link>http://dailyappshow.com/shazam-iphone-app-review/comment-page-1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>DBush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyappshow.com/?p=24#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Jerad:  Thx for covering Shazam!  It seems like a pretty awesome app.  kinda mind-blowing.  

Now all I need is an iPhone!!!!

FYI:  while on the App Store this morning I noticed Midomi does the same thing but also allows you to Hum or sing the song (say if you&#039;ve got a tune stuck in your head).  If you&#039;re bored ;-) you should check it out and do a comparison.  Personally, just looking at the screenshots Shazam looks better IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerad:  Thx for covering Shazam!  It seems like a pretty awesome app.  kinda mind-blowing.  </p>
<p>Now all I need is an iPhone!!!!</p>
<p>FYI:  while on the App Store this morning I noticed Midomi does the same thing but also allows you to Hum or sing the song (say if you&#8217;ve got a tune stuck in your head).  If you&#8217;re bored <img src='http://dailyappshow.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  you should check it out and do a comparison.  Personally, just looking at the screenshots Shazam looks better IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
